The Therapeutic Paradox: Benefits of Medicinal Cannabis in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Legal Barriers in Brazil

Authors

  • Aderbal Silva Aguiar Junior UFSC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58725/rivjr.v2i1.66

Keywords:

cannabis medicinal, epilepsia, autismo, direitos humanos

Abstract

This article investigates the potential benefits of medicinal cannabis use in the treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), with a particular focus on its efficacy in improving behavior and reducing seizures in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy, a condition often associated with ASD. There is a need for further scientific studies to enhance the understanding of the therapeutic application of cannabis, which is common for new treatments, as well as to overcome the challenges posed by current Brazilian regulations. The evidence points to a paradox where, despite advancements in understanding the mechanisms by which cannabis may benefit individuals with ASD, legal barriers limit access and research. The article emphasizes the importance of considering the legal and ethical implications of medicinal cannabis use, suggesting a reflection on current health policies and the need to align therapeutic practices with the most recent scientific evidence.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-01

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Volume 2

Section

Artigos

License

Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Victimology and Restorative Justice

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish in REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE VITIMOLOGIA E JUSTIÇA RESTORATIVE, preserving their copyrights, grant the Journal the right to publish, under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to distribute, create and adapt their work , as well as sharing it, including in productions for commercial purposes, as long as they give due credit for the article and content presented, recognizing its authorship. In addition, the articles, from their authors, express their point of view and not necessarily the official position of the International Journal of Victimology and Restorative Justice.