WOMEN’S HUMAN RIGHTS AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: THE MARIA DA PENHA LAW AS AN INSTRUMENT TO COMBAT VIOLENCE AND GENDER INEQUALITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58725/rivjr.v3i3.159Keywords:
Gender affirmative action, Maria da Penha Law, Human RightsAbstract
The Maria da Penha Law was not created to punish men, but to ensure women’s rights to life, physical, psychological, and moral integrity, freedom, and dignity. This study discusses the importance of this regulation as a form of gender-based affirmative action, examining its foundations, scope, and limitations in addressing domestic violence and promoting equality. To this end, gender inequality, the historical background of the law, its context of emergence, and the intended effects of its implementation are analyzed. The research, of bibliographic and documentary nature, was conducted through a qualitative approach. The findings highlight the decisive contribution of the feminist movement to the achievement of rights and public policies to confront domestic violence, as well as a historical and structural understanding of gender-based violence. However, challenges persist in its application, which perpetuate violence. It is concluded that the Maria da Penha Law, as an affirmative action measure based on human rights principles, is fundamental to ensuring women’s integrity, access to justice, and equal participation.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Victimology and Restorative Justice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE VITIMOLOGIA E JUSTIÇA RESTORATIVE, preserving their copyrights, grant the Journal the right to publish, under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to distribute, create and adapt their work , as well as sharing it, including in productions for commercial purposes, as long as they give due credit for the article and content presented, recognizing its authorship. In addition, the articles, from their authors, express their point of view and not necessarily the official position of the International Journal of Victimology and Restorative Justice.

