Violência Contra a Mulher: Combater ou Reeducar a Sociedade?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58725/rivjr.v3i3.152Keywords:
violência contra a mulher, prevenção, igualdade de gênero, Lei Maria da Penha, . Rescisão e/ou Cancelamento do Plano de Saúde, reeducação do agressorAbstract
Violence against women is a complex social phenomenon and a harsh reality in Brazil, representing a social scourge of alarming proportions. It manifests in various forms of aggression, including physical, psychological, sexual, and economic violence. This type of violence is deeply rooted in cultural norms inherited from the patriarchal structure established in Brazilian society. However, it is not solely a national issue, as it has long been recognized by international human rights organizations. In alignment with global efforts, Brazil has developed legal frameworks and policies aimed at combating gender-based violence, such as the Maria da Penha Law (Law No. 11.340/2006), which seeks to punish aggressors and provide protection tools for victims. This article presents an in-depth analysis of the strategies used to confront this endemic violence, advocating for the reeducation of society as a fundamental pillar for its prevention and eventual eradication. The discussion is grounded in an extensive literature review, supported by recent research data and legal milestones that focus on protecting women's rights.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Victimology and Restorative Justice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE VITIMOLOGIA E JUSTIÇA RESTORATIVE, preserving their copyrights, grant the Journal the right to publish, under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to distribute, create and adapt their work , as well as sharing it, including in productions for commercial purposes, as long as they give due credit for the article and content presented, recognizing its authorship. In addition, the articles, from their authors, express their point of view and not necessarily the official position of the International Journal of Victimology and Restorative Justice.

